Skip to content

Comparison of Three Meshes in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair

CompletedNot applicableNCT01295437
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.

This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.

Brief summary (from the registry)

Chronic pain may be a long-term problem after inguinal Lichtenstein hernioplasty. The aim of this study was to compare long-term results of hernioplasty using three different meshes (partly absorbable, lightweight polypropylene and thick polypropylene mesh).

Study details

Official title
A Single-surgeon Randomized Study Comparing Three Composite Meshes on Chronic Pain After Lichtenstein Hernia Repair in Local Anesthesia
Conditions
Interventions
  • Device: Vypro II mesh
  • Device: Premilene LP
  • Device: Premilene mesh
Sponsor
Kuopio University Hospital
Collaborators
Mikkeli Central Hospital
Start date
2003-03
Primary completion
2005-01
Sex
All
Age range
from 18 Years to 85 Years
Results posted
No results posted in this snapshot
Countries
Finland
Total sites listed
1

Eligibility criteria

Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: * uni-or bilateral primary or recurrent inguinal hernia * patients age \>18yrs Exclusion Criteria: * previous mesh hernioplasty * femoral hernia * emergency operation * allergy to polypropylene

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01295437