Relationship Between Clinical Tests and Clinical Outcomes After Motor Control Exercises Intervention
CompletedNot applicableNCT02398760
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.
This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.
Brief summary (from the registry)
Nowadays, the research priority in low back pain area have been find subgroup of patients with the same characteristics that might achieve better outcomes in a specific intervention. However, even though the studies in this area have increased, questions of this nature remaining without an adequate answer, or with limited evidence. Therefore, the investigators propose to examine the ability of clinical tests, developed to assess alterations related to clinical lumbar instability, to identify subgroups of patients with non specific chronic low back pain that may have better outcomes after a motor control exercises intervention.
Study details
- Official title
- Relationship Between Clinical Tests and Clinical Outcomes After Motor Control Exercises Intervention for Non-specific Chronic Low Back Patients
- Conditions
- Interventions
- Sponsor
- Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
- Collaborators
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
- Start date
- 2014-07
- Primary completion
- 2016-02
- Sex
- All
- Age range
- from 18 Years to 60 Years
- Results posted
- No results posted in this snapshot
- Countries
- Brazil
- Total sites listed
- 1
Eligibility criteria
Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: * between 18 and 60 years. * non specific chronic low back (pain for more than 3 months) with pain intensity of at least 3 points measured by pain numerical rating scale (0-10) and disability of at least 6 points in the 24-item Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (0-24). * classified as low or medium risk though StarT Back Screening Tool Exclusion Criteria: * cardiovascular and neurological pathologies * serious pathology in the spine and pelvic. * previous spinal surgery of at least 1 year before the trial period. * check-list with the red flags was performed to exclusion * classified as high risk through StarT Back Screening Tool, due these patients have high psychological components and needed of specialized psychological attendance
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02398760