Skip to content

Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Exercise vs Exercise in Subjects With Chronic Cervical Pain and Upper Cervical Spine Dysfunction

CompletedNot applicableNCT03670719
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.

This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.

Brief summary (from the registry)

There is a lot of scientific evidence about the effectiveness of manual therapy and exercise / training in subjects with cervical pain. Most of the high quality systematic reviews agree on the need to combine manual therapy and exercise for the treatment of chronic cervical pain. However, articles that focus on manual therapy in the treatment of the upper cervical spine are not as common, being that the most commonly prescribed exercises are those of craniocervical flexion, (flexion of the upper cervical spine). The investigators believe that participants who are going to benefit more from the integration of manual therapy and exercise will be those who have a real restriction of the upper cervical spine, and for these, is indispensable, the application of manual therapy techniques before the integration of the active exercise to obtain optimal results. This project is going to try to define participants with chronic cervical pain and upper cervical spine restriction that may benefit more from the combination of manual therapy and exercise than the rest. The investigators are going to study changes in different variables about function, pain, ultrasound, muscle tone, joints... Strengthen the importance of specificity in physiotherapy interventions and increase the evidence on the importance of manual therapy in a subgroup of participants with chronic cervical pain, improve knowledge about the involvement of the upper cervical spine in cervical pathology and check the effectiveness of a self-treatment program for participants with chronic cervical pain. The objective of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of an integrative approach of manual therapy associated with exercise versus exercise in participants with chronic cervical pain and upper cervical spine dysfunction. For this purpose, the investigators conduct a randomized controlled trial, simple-blind (Only is possible to blind the evaluator). The Sample size is 52 participants (2 groups of 26 participants…

Study details

Official title
Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Exercise vs Exercise in Subjects With Chronic Cervical Pain and Upper Cervical Spine Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Interventions
Sponsor
Universidad de Zaragoza
Start date
2018-10-10
Primary completion
2019-11-01
Sex
All
Age range
from 18 Years to 90 Years
Results posted
No results posted in this snapshot
Countries
Spain
Total sites listed
1

Eligibility criteria

Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: * 18 years old and over * Medical diagnosis of chronic cervical pain (more than 3 months of cervical pain evolution) * Positive flexion rotation test Exclusion Criteria: * Recent spine, head or mouth surgery. * Diabetes mellitus * Recent infection and/or inflammatory arthritis, and cervical and/or brain traumatism records. * Contraindication for manual therapy or cervical training

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03670719