Fast Track Total Hip Arthroplasty vs Standard Care
CompletedNot applicableNCT04211987
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.
This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.
Brief summary (from the registry)
Fast-track total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a well-established concept including optimized logistics and evidence-based treatment, focusing on minimizing surgical stress and improved post-operative recovery. The aim of this protocol is to compare the standard care and fast track total hip arthroplasties in terms of functional and subjective outcomes, hospital staying, number of transfusions and analgesic consumption.
Study details
- Official title
- Evaluation of Functional Rehabilitation Fast Track Total Hip Arthroplasty vs Standard Care: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- Conditions
- Interventions
- Procedure: fast track care protocol
- Procedure: standard care protocol
- Sponsor
- Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
- Start date
- 2018-03-13
- Primary completion
- 2020-12-31
- Sex
- All
- Age range
- from 18 Years to 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- true
- Results posted
- No results posted in this snapshot
- Countries
- Italy
- Total sites listed
- 1
Eligibility criteria
Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients affected by hip osteoarthritis, eligible for primary total hip arthroplasty * BMI \< 32 * American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system (ASA) \</= 2 * preoperative hemoglobin (HB) \>13 g/dl * patients eligible for spinal anesthesia * presence of a care-giver Exclusion Criteria: * psychiatric diseases * preoperative use of crutches * ASA \> 3 * preoperative HB \< 13 g/dl
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04211987