Health-economic Evaluation of Interventional Pain Management Compared to Pain Rehabilitation
CompletedNCT04657159
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.
This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.
Brief summary (from the registry)
The overall aim of the study is to evaluate interventional pain management. This is done in three steps: 1. To find matched controls to the patients in the study on cost-effectiveness of IPM and compare the results. 2. To calculate cost-effectiveness of PRP during the period 2010-2016, on a national level. 3. To calculate cost-effectiveness of PRP during the period 2017-2019, after the changed guidelines for PRP in Sweden. The two last steps are to provide a background to the results of IPM, and to see if the results in the subgroup of matched controls of PRP-patients differ from the results from the whole population.
Study details
- Official title
- Health-economic Evaluation of Interventional Pain Management Compared to Pain Rehabilitation
- Conditions
- Interventions
- Other: Pain rehabilitation program
- Sponsor
- Eques Indolor AB
- Collaborators
- Umeå University
- Start date
- 2020-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2021-12-30
- Sex
- All
- Age range
- from 18 Years to 94 Years
- Results posted
- No results posted in this snapshot
- Countries
- Sweden
- Total sites listed
- 2
Eligibility criteria
Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: Been through pain rehabilitation program Exclusion Criteria: \-
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04657159