Skip to content

Comparison Between Two Physical Therapy Treatments in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain

CompletedNot applicableNCT04695730
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.

This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.

Brief summary (from the registry)

Introduction: Non-specific chronic neck pain is a very prevalent condition in the population ranging from 45% to 54%. Several conservative treatments have been shown to be effective and are currently used in clinical practice. However, among the physical therapy ones, no study evaluated the effectiveness of Pompage techniques in addition to an active treatment. This protocol describes a controlled, randomized trial that aims to assess the effectiveness of two physical therapy treatments in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. Methods: Seventy subjects with chronic nonspecific neck pain from 18 to 80 years will be recruited according to the inclusion criteria. Afterwards they will be randomized to one of the 2 groups: group 1 (G1) will undergo an active intervention and group 2 (G2) will receive the same active intervention plus manual technique. Active intervention, according to the current guidelines on non-specific neck pain, will be a treatment including both pain education and home exercises; manual technique will be the so-called "Pompage" technique. A booster session will be planned for both groups after 4 weeks from the beginning of the trial, to reinforce the patients adherence to the self-treatment. The patients will be evaluated before the treatments (baseline, T0), after 8 weeks from the beginning of the treatments (T1), and 6 months after the end of the treatments (T2). The primary outcome will be pain perception, which will be assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes will be: kinesiophobia (measured with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia - TSK), physical function (measured with the Neck Disability Index - NDI), active cervical range of motion - ROM (measured with the "CROM Deluxe" device), patient satisfaction for treatment (measured with the Physical Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire - PTPSQI(15)), and subjective perception of improvement (measured with the Global Perceived Effect - GPE). Adverse effects will be reg…

Study details

Official title
Comparison Between Two Physical Therapy Treatments in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain
Conditions
  • Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain
Interventions
  • Other: Active physical therapy (including both pain education and home exercises)
  • Other: Active physical therapy plus manual therapy
Sponsor
University of Bologna
Start date
2021-02-09
Primary completion
2022-06-17
Sex
All
Age range
from 18 Years to 80 Years
Results posted
No results posted in this snapshot
Countries
Italy
Total sites listed
1

Eligibility criteria

Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: * Female and male subjects aged between 18 and 80 years with non-specific neck pain lasting for more than 3 months. * Informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Subjects with acute or subacute neck pain; * Subjects with specific etiology for neck pain (e.g. trauma, herniated disc, vertebral deformities, fractures); * Subjects with central or peripheral neurological signs; * Individuals with systemic diseases, neuromuscular diseases, rheumatic diseases, cognitive deficit, tumors; * Subjects who underwent surgery within 6 months preceding enrollment; * Subjects who underwent physical therapy treatment within 6 months preceding enrollment.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04695730