Comparing the Treatment Outcomes of Two Interventional Pain Procedures in Chronic Coccygodynia
CompletedNot applicableNCT04902742
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.
This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.
Brief summary (from the registry)
Coccygodynia is a disabling pain in the coccyx exacerbated by sitting or rising from sitting. The pain is often pulling or lancinating in quality, may radiate to the sacrum or buttock, and may coexist with lower back pain. Contributing of many physiologic and psychological factors to its etiology, it may be traumatic or idiopathic in origin. Many risk factors are known such as trauma, female gender and obesity. Despite the identification of chronic coccygeal pain hundreds of years ago, its treatment can be difficult and sometimes controversial because of the multifactorial nature of coccygeal pain. Most cases of coccygodynia resolve within weeks to months with or without conservative treatment, but for a few patients, the pain can become chronic and debilitating. First-line treatment options include analgesic drugs, cushion, sit baths, and manuel therapy. Interventional procedures for pain management can be applied to patients who have no response to other conservative modalities. Ganglion impar block and caudal epidural steroid injection are two treatment options for chronic coccygodynia and both of them can be applied by guidance of fluoroscopy and ultrasonography. Radiofrequency ablation is the other option for treatment and eventually, surgical intervention can be done for patients who have refractory pain despite other treatments. Although efficacy of two interventional procedure for chronic coccygodynia, ganglion impar block and caudal epidural steroid injection, has been well known, no study is exist comparing the efficacy of them. We aimed to compare the efficacy of ganglion impar block and caudal epidural steroid injection in chronic coccygodynia.
Study details
- Official title
- Comparison of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Coccygodynia Patients Treated With Ganglion Impar Blockade Versus Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection: A Prospective Randomized Comparison Study
- Conditions
- Tailbone Disorders
- Interventions
- Procedure: Fluoroscopy-guided ganglion impar block
- Procedure: Fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural steroid injection
- Sponsor
- Marmara University
- Start date
- 2019-06-01
- Primary completion
- 2021-01-01
- Sex
- All
- Age range
- from 18 Years to 65 Years
- Results posted
- No results posted in this snapshot
- Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
- Total sites listed
- 1
Eligibility criteria
Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients diagnosed with chronic coccygodynia between the ages of 18 and 65 * Intractable pain over the coccyx despite conservative treatment Exclusion Criteria: * History of ganglion impar blockade and/or caudal epidural steroid injection carried out in the last 3 months * History of lumbar surgery * Systemic and/or local infections * Malignancy * Bleeding diathesis * Acute fracture * Known allergy to contrast material and/or local anesthetic substances * Known history of any psychiatric disorder * History of pregnancy
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04902742