MFR Versus PFS Techniques on Pain,Range of Motion And Disability in Chronic Non Specific Low Back Pain.
CompletedNot applicableNCT05811260
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.
This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.
Brief summary (from the registry)
To compare effect of myofascial Release versus post facilitation stretch in term of pain ,range of motion and disability in chronic non specific low back pain in patients.
Study details
- Official title
- Effects of Myofascial Release Versus Post Facilitation Stretch Techniques on Pain,Range of Motion And Disability in Chronic Non Specific Low Back Pain.
- Conditions
- Chronic Non Specific Low Back Pain
- Interventions
- Other: Myofascial Release technique
- Other: Post facilitation stretch .
- Sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Start date
- 2023-03-31
- Primary completion
- 2023-08-01
- Sex
- All
- Age range
- from 40 Years to 55 Years
- Results posted
- No results posted in this snapshot
- Countries
- Pakistan
- Total sites listed
- 1
Eligibility criteria
Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: * Male and female adults already diagnosed with LBP * Between ages group of 40-55 years. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who had LBP originating from various pathologies, such as presence of * cord compression, * radiculopathy, * osteoporosis,
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05811260