Effectiveness of KT VS ST Along With Routine Physical Therapy Among Patients of Chronic Low Back Pain RCT
Unknown statusNot applicableNCT05855915
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.
This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.
Brief summary (from the registry)
To determine the effectiveness of Kineso taping (KT) Versus Sham taping along with routine physical therapy among Chronic Low Back pain (CLBP) patients.
Study details
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping Versus Sham Taping Along With Routine Physical Therapy Among Patients of Chronic Low Back Pain A Randomised Trial
- Conditions
- Interventions
- Diagnostic test: Kinesio taping
- Diagnostic test: Sham taping
- Sponsor
- Superior University
- Start date
- 2023-04-01
- Primary completion
- 2023-06-01
- Sex
- All
- Age range
- from 18 Years to 65 Years
- Results posted
- No results posted in this snapshot
- Countries
- Pakistan
- Total sites listed
- 1
Eligibility criteria
Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: Pain in the area between 12 ribs and hip crease with or without leg pain. Age ranges from 18 to 65 years. Low back pain for 6 weeks. Moderate pain intensity with pain score. Exclusion Criteria: Known or suspected Spinal lesions. Spinal surgery within first 6 months. Physical Therapy for low back pain for past 6 months. Severe Complications.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05855915