Skip to content

Erector Spinae vs. PENG Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty

CompletedPhase 4NCT06083428
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.

This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.

Brief summary (from the registry)

Effect of PENG block and ESPB on pain management, and NLR and PLR following knee arthroplasty

Study details

Official title
Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) vs. PENG Block for Pain Management and Stress Response in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Prospective, Randomized Trial.
Conditions
Interventions
  • Drug: Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution Erector Spinae Plane Block
  • Drug: Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution - PENG block
  • Drug: Control Test
Sponsor
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Start date
2023-10-17
Primary completion
2024-06-11
Sex
All
Age range
from 20 Years to 90 Years
Results posted
No results posted in this snapshot
Countries
Poland
Total sites listed
1

Eligibility criteria

Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with ASA classification I-III, Aged 20-90 years, Who will be scheduled for hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who have a history of bleeding diathesis, Take anticoagulant therapy, have a History of chronic pain before surgery, have Multiple trauma, cannot assess their pain (dementia), have been operated on under general anesthesia, have an infection in the area and do not accept the procedure

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06083428