Dry Needling Versus Percutaneous Electrolysis in Lumbar Multifidus Muscles in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
Unknown statusNot applicableNCT06505161
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.
This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.
Brief summary (from the registry)
The aim of this study is to evaluate the reduction of pain of two different treatments in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients were divided in two groups. The control group will receive DN treatment, and the experimental group will receive PE, both in the lumbar multifidus muscles.
Study details
- Official title
- Dry Needling Versus Percutaneous Electrolysis in Lumbar Multifidus Muscles in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
- Conditions
- Interventions
- Other: Dry needling
- Other: Percutaneous electrolysis
- Sponsor
- University of Alcala
- Start date
- 2024-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2025-06-01
- Sex
- All
- Age range
- from 30 Years to 60 Years
- Results posted
- No results posted in this snapshot
- Countries
- Spain
- Total sites listed
- 1
Eligibility criteria
Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: * Low back pain ≥ 3 months. * Age between 30 and 60 years old. * Not being receiving other physical therapy Exclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of specific lumbar pathology. * History of previous lumbar surgery. * Treatment with corticosteroids, anti-inflammatory or antibiotic medication in recent weeks. * Oncological processes, febrile symptoms or thrombophlebitis. * Skin conditions. * Belonephobia. * Pacemaker. * Pregnancy. * Patients with neurological pathology
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06505161