Suboccipital Distraction vs. Manual Traction in Chronic Neck Pain
CompletedNot applicableNCT06751758
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.
This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.
Brief summary (from the registry)
This study addresses the pervasive issue of chronic neck pain, a debilitating condition with profound implications for daily life and well-being. Two therapeutic techniques, suboccipital distraction, and manual traction, are under investigation for their potential to alleviate upper cervical pain and enhance mobility in individuals suffering from chronic neck pain. The primary goal is to compare the effects of these interventions on upper cervical pain, range of motion, and functional disability, providing valuable insights for healthcare professionals to optimize treatment strategies and enhance outcomes in this challenging context. The research adopts a Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) design to rigorously evaluate the impact of suboccipital distraction and manual traction on upper cervical pain, range of motion, and functional disability in chronic neck pain patients. The Gpower t-test sample size calculation ensures a robust sample size, enhancing statistical power and the validity of findings. Participants will be recruited from Neuro clinic, Lahore, using non-probability convenient sampling. The lottery method will be employed for randomizing participants into suboccipital distraction and manual traction groups, ensuring a balanced distribution of key characteristics. The diverse patient population at Neuro Clinic enhances the generalizability of the study's results. The treatment plan spans 4 weeks, comprising three sessions per week. Each session involves three sets of suboccipital distraction or manual traction, with 5 to 7 repetitions per set. Baseline assessments will be conducted, followed by post-treatment assessments at the 4-week mark. Outcome measures, including standardized pain scales, goniometry for range of motion, and validated instruments for functional disability, will be systematically collected during these intervals.
Study details
- Official title
- Effects of Sub Occipital Distraction Versus Manual Traction on Upper Cervical Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Chronic Neck Pain
- Conditions
- Interventions
- Other: C1-C2 Mobilization
- Other: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
- Other: Suboccipital Distraction
- Other: Traction
- Sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Start date
- 2024-07-15
- Primary completion
- 2024-12-30
- Sex
- All
- Age range
- from 20 Years to 40 Years
- Results posted
- No results posted in this snapshot
- Countries
- Pakistan
- Total sites listed
- 1
Eligibility criteria
Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: * Minimum chronicity: of 3 months chronic neck pain (21) * Spurling test (22) Exclusion Criteria: * Chronic systemic bony diseases * Degenerative joint diseases * Psychiatric diseases * Recent history of trauma
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06751758