Skip to content

Telerehabilitation in Managing Chronic Low Back Pain

Not yet recruitingNot applicableNCT06844825
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.

This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.

Brief summary (from the registry)

The purpose of this study is to determine whether telerehabilitation is as effective as in-person rehabilitation in treating patients with chronic back pain in actual clinical practice settings.T he study will recruit eighty-four individuals with chronic LBP, who will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: telerehabilitation (TR) or the control group, who will receive standard clinic therapy. The TR group will be treated remotely via phone calls and the Zoom platform. The intervention program will be customized according to the requirements and abilities of each patient. It will include self-management skills, education and support, including Pain Neuroscience Education , and customized exercises.

Study details

Official title
The Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Versus In-Person Rehabilitation in Managing Chronic Low Back Pain: a Pragmatic Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
Conditions
  • Low Back Pain (LBP)
Interventions
  • Other: Tele rehabilitation
  • Other: usual care only
Sponsor
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Start date
2025-03-25
Primary completion
2025-10-30
Sex
All
Age range
from 18 Years
Results posted
No results posted in this snapshot
Total sites listed
0

Eligibility criteria

Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: Adults aged 18 and above with non-specific chronic low back pain more than 12 weeks. Exclusion Criteria: Cancer, systematic or neurological diseases, fracture, recent surgery on the spine and/or extremities, cognitive impairment, pregnant women, and communication barriers or other medical conditions contraindicating TR. If there is any presence of red flags, such as cauda equina syndrome, spinal infection, spinal compression fractures, spinal stress fractures, ankylosing spondylitis, or aneurysm will also be excluded.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06844825