Determining the Prognostic Value of Continuous Intrathecal Infusion
CompletedPhase 4NCT03523000
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.
This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.
Brief summary (from the registry)
The purpose of this study will be to determine the efficacy and the prognostic value of a continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test in an in-hospital setting for selecting patients who would have better long term outcomes for treatment with intrathecal implantable devices. The investigators will compare the primary outcomes \[changes in pain intensity score (NRS), patient global impression of change (PGIC)\] before and after intrathecal infusion of an admixture of bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml versus normal saline. The study will include 36 patients with intractable chronic low back pain in the setting of lumbar post-laminectomy syndrome or vertebral compression fracture who failed conservative management and are considered candidates for IDDS. Prior to the implant, the patients will undergo an intrathecal prognostic infusion test with an externalized catheter. Baseline NRS pain scores will be assessed and documented on all patients upon admission to the preoperative area. An intrathecal catheter will be placed in the outpatient procedure suite at the appropriate level for target dermatomes. The needle entry point will occur in the upper lumbar spine and catheter tip will be placed in the lower thoracic spine, under local anesthesia with the patient awake and with minimal or no sedation. The intrathecal infusion will be started using an external pump once patient is in the PACU. The research component is to perform the intrathecal test with normal saline (inactive placebo solution) in addition to a test with fentanyl and bupivacaine (active solution). Patients will be randomly assigned to either Group I (continuous infusion of bupivacaine and fentanyl followed by saline) or Group II (continuous infusion of saline followed by bupivacaine and fentanyl). In PACU, patients will be started on an infusion rate of 0.5 ml/hr and titrated to pain relief greater than 50% of baseline or up to 0.8-1.0 ml/hr within 6-8 hrs after start of the infusion. A cli…
Study details
- Official title
- A Randomized Double Blind Cross-over Trial of Continuous Intrathecal Infusion for Assessing Patients With Chronic Non-cancer Pain Who Would Benefit From Treatment With Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (IDDS) Implant
- Conditions
- Lumbar Post-Laminectomy Syndrome
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Vertebral Compression Fracture
- Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
- Interventions
- Other: Continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test
- Drug: Bupivacaine
- Drug: Fentanyl
- Drug: Placebo
- Device: Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (IDDS)
- Sponsor
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
- Start date
- 2017-10-18
- Primary completion
- 2021-10-12
- Sex
- All
- Age range
- from 30 Years
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Countries
- United States
- Total sites listed
- 1
Eligibility criteria
Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: * Previous lumbar or thoracic spine surgery or lower thoracic/lumbar vertebral compression fracture * Intractable pain of trunk (more than limbs) * Patient who passed psychological evaluations as part of the usual clinical care prior to consideration of IDDS and are stable with current pain condition and medications * Failed more conservative management. Exclusion Criteria: * Untreated coagulopathy or infection. * Immune compromised state precluding having an implant. * Allergic reactions to bupivacaine or fentanyl. * Pregnancy * Patients using more than 30 mg oral equivalents of morphine daily or who are unable to wean down below that dosage for more than 4 weeks before the prognostic intrathecal infusion test. * Neurological deficits characterized as weakness in lower extremities with evidence of nerve damage * Patients with cognitive disorders who would not be able to provide meaningful outcome responses
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03523000