Skip to content

Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided ESP Vs Video-assisted PVB Catheter Placement in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery

CompletedNot applicableNCT04729712
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.

This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.

Brief summary (from the registry)

Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery (MITS) is a surgical method used to perform lung surgery through small incisions between the ribs and includes both Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) and Robotic assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS). MITS can cause a significant amount of postoperative pain and if this is not adequately controlled, it can delay the patient's recovery and it may be a precipitating factor for the development of Chronic Persistent Surgical Pain (CPSP). Regional anaesthesia is the use of nerve numbing medications known as local anaesthetics to block sensations of pain from a specific area of the body. For MITS, blocking pain arising from the chest wall/rib cage would improve the patient's recovery after the operation and overall patient satisfaction. There have been significant advancements made in thoracic (chest wall) regional anaesthesia techniques. Ultimately, this involves injecting local anaesthetics around the nerves that supply the chest wall. A single injection of these medications will only have a maximum effect for up to 12 hours and often this is considerably less. To prolong the pain free benefit, a thin tube known as a catheter will be placed so that the local anaesthesia medication can be continuously given by a specific mechanical pump designed for this purpose. This mechanical pump will be located at the patient's bedside and can precisely deliver the medication in question at a rate between 10-15 ml/hr. This infusion of local anaesthesia medication will continue for 48 hours after the operation and will be monitored by the hospital's pain team. The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of two techniques for thoracic regional anaesthesia after this type of surgery. Participants will be randomly assigned (like tossing a coin) to receive either an Anaesthesiologist ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) with catheter insertion or surgeon video-assisted Paravertebral block (PVB) with catheter insertion. Both t…

Study details

Official title
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Catheter Versus Video-assisted Paravertebral Catheter Placement in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery (MITS): Comparing Continuous Infusion Analgesic Techniques on Early Quality of Recovery, Respiratory Function, and Chronic Persistent Surgical Pain: A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Clinical Trial.
Conditions
Interventions
  • Procedure: Anaesthesiologist-administered ultrasound guided Erector Spinae block with catheter insertion
  • Procedure: Surgeon-administered video-assisted Paravertebral block with catheter insertion
Sponsor
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
Start date
2021-05-12
Primary completion
2022-02-10
Sex
All
Age range
from 18 Years to 85 Years
Results posted
No results posted in this snapshot
Countries
Ireland
Total sites listed
2

Eligibility criteria

Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: * Male and Female participants providing written informed consent * American Society of Anesthesiologist grade 1-4 * Unilateral MITS (VATS and RATS) under general anaesthesia Exclusion Criteria: * Absence of written consent * Unexpected conversion of MITS to open thoracotomy * Contraindications to peripheral regional anaesthesia block: (Infection at local site, allergy to local anaesthesia medications, patient refusal, previous or existing neurological deficit, anticoagulated patients) * Known dementia at time of MITS and inability to give informed consent * Unexpected post-operative admission to ICU for continued ventilation * History of opioid abuse

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04729712