The Effect of Both Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy Guide Erector Spinae Plane Blocks
Unknown statusNot applicableNCT05044247
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.
This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.
Brief summary (from the registry)
Since the original publication on the erector spinae plane (ESP) block in 2016, the technique of the ESP block has evolved significantly in the last few years. Current reports suggest that the ESP block provides adequate analgesia in thoracic and abdominal sites in a post-surgical and chronic pain patient. However, there were still inconsistencies and unclear spread of local anesthetics in ultrasound guide ESP block. This study focusing on the spread of local anesthetic in ESP block under ultrasound and fluoroscopy and possible mechanisms of action.
Study details
- Official title
- The Effect of Both Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy Guide Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Patient Undergo Breast Surgery or Pain Intervention Procedures
- Conditions
- Interventions
- Procedure: ESP blocks
- Sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Start date
- 2021-04-20
- Primary completion
- 2021-09
- Sex
- All
- Age range
- from 20 Years
- Results posted
- No results posted in this snapshot
- Countries
- Taiwan
- Total sites listed
- 1
Eligibility criteria
Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Thirty-five patients in each group of breast tumor surgery and pain intervention procedure patients. 2. Age \> 20 Exclusion Criteria: 1. Unable to complete questionnaires. 2. With coagulopathy 3. History of thoracic spine trauma or surgery. 4. Allergy to contrast local anesthetics and medium (Iohexol)
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05044247