Neurodynamic Moblization Versus Mulligan on Pain and Functional Abilities in Patients With Chronic Discogenic Sciatica
CompletedNot applicableNCT07050108
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.
This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.
Brief summary (from the registry)
The purpose of the present study to compare between the effect of neurodynamic moblizaton and Mulligan SNAG's moblization on patients with chronic unilateral discogenic sciatica.
Study details
- Official title
- Effect of Neurodynamic Mobilization Versus Mulligan on Pain and Functional Abilities in Patients With Chronic Discogenic Sciatica
- Conditions
- Sciatica
- Discogenic Pain
- Interventions
- Other: neurodynamic mobilization
- Other: mulligan therapy
- Other: selected physical therapy program
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Start date
- 2025-08-10
- Primary completion
- 2026-01-10
- Sex
- All
- Age range
- from 35 Years to 50 Years
- Results posted
- No results posted in this snapshot
- Countries
- Egypt
- Total sites listed
- 1
Eligibility criteria
Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: * All the patients diagnosed as lumbar radiculopathy (L5-S1) for at least six months. Diagnosis was confirmed by physical, neurological examination (motor assessment, sensory assessment, reflexes) and radiological assessment (CT or MRI). * All patients has second grade of disc bulge which will detect from T2 axial view of MRI according to Fardon and Milette * All patients has unilateral radiculopathy and pain in the distribution of scaitic nerve. * The age of the patients will range from 35 to 50years . Their body mass index will range between( 22-25) Exclusion Criteria: * Bilateral and multilevel disc prolapse or bilateral radtadiating pain * acute pain (pain less than three months). * Presence of active infection in lumbar spine. * Any other spinal deformities. * Postoperative cases. * Cauda equine lesion. * Neoplasmic. * Spinal stenosis. * Mechanical low back pain. * Failed back syndrome.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07050108