Skip to content

The Role of Therapeutic Ultrasound in Comparison With Electrical Dry Needling in Chronic Low Back Patients Post Cesarean Section

CompletedNot applicableNCT07246369
View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Recruiting status changes often. Contact the study team listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and talk to your doctor before joining a study.

This study has no listed site in Canada in this snapshot. It is included as part of the worldwide chronic pain corpus.

Brief summary (from the registry)

HYPOTHESIS Null Hypothesis (HO): There was a non-significant difference in the role of therapeutic ultrasound in comparison with electrical dry needling in chronic low back patients post cesarean-section. Alternative Hypothesis (HA): There was a significant difference in the role of therapeutic ultrasound in comparison with electrical dry needling in chronic low back patients post cesarean-section.

Study details

Official title
The Role of Therapeutic Ultrasound in Comparison With Electrical Dry Needling in Chronic Low Back Patients Post Cesarean Section
Conditions
Interventions
  • Other: Electrical Dry Needling
  • Other: Ultrasound
Sponsor
University of Lahore
Start date
2024-10-14
Primary completion
2025-03-30
Sex
Female
Age range
from 25 Years to 35 Years
Results posted
No results posted in this snapshot
Countries
Pakistan
Total sites listed
1

Eligibility criteria

Show eligibility criteria (verbatim from the registry)
Inclusion Criteria: * Female patients aged 25-35 years. * History of cesarean section with epidural anesthesia * Within the past 6 months to 8 months. * Primiparous, postpartum women. * Chronic low back pain persisting for more than 3 months. * Pain intensity of at least four on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Exclusion Criteria: * Previous low back surgery. * Multiparous, postpartum women. * History of Fracture (pubic fractures, vertebral fracture) and osteoporosis * Having a stillborn fetus or lethal induction of labor. * Severe comorbid conditions (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, cardiovascular disease). * Patients who experienced a C-section with general anesthesia

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Library of Medicine), snapshot October 2026. Check the registry for current recruiting status. Record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07246369